如何让自己脚本只打其中一行_如果我在其中，自己拥有照片吗？

如何让自己脚本只打其中一行

There are a lot of misconceptions out there about who is able to do what with photographs. One of the most pervasive ideas is that because you’re in a photo you own it, have “joint copyright”, or our in some other way entitled to use it. To some degree it makes sense: that’s your face in the picture, but sadly it’s just not how things work. So let’s answer the question properly: do you own a photo if you’re in it?

关于谁有能力对照片进行处理，存在很多误解。最普遍的想法之一是，因为您在照片中拥有照片，因此拥有“共同版权”，或者我们拥有以其他方式使用它的权利。从某种程度上说，这是有道理的：那是您在照片中的面Kong，但可悲的是，这并不是事情的运作方式。因此，让我们正确回答这个问题：如果您在其中，您是否拥有照片？

版权和照片 (Copyright and Photographs)

When it comes to photographs, all these questions revolve around copyright. These are the collection of laws that protect creators of original works from being ripped off wholesale. Copyright is what prevents other websites just taking my articles on this site, How-To Geek, and republishing them elsewhere without our permission.

关于照片，所有这些问题都与版权有关。这些都是法律的集合，可以保护原始作品的创作者免于被全部剥夺。版权是阻止其他网站在未经我们允许的情况下仅将我的文章(如何使用极客)带到该网站上并将其重新发布到其他地方的原因。

Whenever someone takes a photo, they’re creating an original work. They can use a multi-thousand dollar DSLR or an iPhone; pushing the shutter button is all that’s necessary. If you’re in the image, nothing changes: the photographer is still creating an original work and thus getting the copyright. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a photo of you or a duck, the photographer owns it. Since the photographer owns the photo, you as the subject don’t have any rights to it.

每当有人拍照时，他们都在创作原始作品。他们可以使用数千美元的数码单反相机或iPhone。按下快门按钮就足够了。如果您在图像中，则什么都不会改变：摄影师仍在创作原始作品并因此获得版权。不管是您的照片还是鸭子的照片，摄影师都拥有。由于摄影师拥有照片，因此您作为主题没有任何权利。

Even though Ali is the one in the photo, I hold the copyright because I took it.

即使阿里是照片中的那个，我还是拥有版权，因为我拥有了它。

Let’s use a practical example: you’re at a wedding, and the photographer takes a load of pictures and puts them up on their website. There are full versions for sale, but one of the low resolution previews that would make a great Facebook profile picture. Can you download one and use it?

让我们举一个实际的例子：您正在参加婚礼，摄影师拍摄了大量照片并将其放在其网站上。有完整的版本可供出售，但是其中一个低分辨率的预览版可以使Facebook的个人资料更加生动。您可以下载并使用它吗？

Simply, no.

简单地说，不。

It doesn’t matter that it’s a lovely photo of you. Publishing the photo on Facebook is violating the photographer’s copyright. They could even sue you. The same is true for any other photos of you floating around. If your friend takes a photo of you, in theory, you should ask their permission before making it your profile picture and especially before printing it to stick on your wall. Now obviously your friend is unlikely to mind, but the underlying laws aren’t changed.

没关系，这是您的可爱照片。在Facebook上发布照片侵犯了摄影师的版权。他们甚至可以起诉您。对于您周围漂浮的其他任何照片也是如此。从理论上讲，如果您的朋友为您拍照，则在将其制作为个人资料图片之前，尤其是在将其打印以粘贴在墙上之前，应征得他们的许可。现在显然您的朋友不太可能介意，但基本法律没有改变。

Copyright is also something the photographer can transfer or give up. With a Creative Commons license, the photographer gives other people the right to use their image subject to some specific requirements. For example, some Creative Commons licenses require you to credit the original creator; others require that you release whatever you create with their image under Creative Commons yourself. Photographers can also sell the copyright to their work. This is common if they’re doing “work-for-hire”. Similarly, I don’t own the copyright for the content I create for How-To Geek. The rule, however, is that unless it’s stated that an image is released under Creative Commons or otherwise free for you to use, you should assume it’s copyrighted.

版权也是摄影师可以转让或放弃的。拥有知识共享许可，摄影师根据其他特定要求授予其他人使用其图像的权利。例如，某些创用CC许可要求您将原始创建者归功；其他人则要求您自己释放在创用CC下使用其图像创建的任何内容。摄影师也可以出售其作品的版权。如果他们正在做“雇用工作”，这很常见。同样，对于我为How-To Geek创建的内容，我也不拥有版权。但是，规则是，除非声明图像是根据知识共享发布的或免费供您使用，否则您应假定该图像已受版权保护。

影像权和你 (Image Rights and You)

While you’re not entitled to use a photo of you that someone else holds the copyright of, they’re also limited in what they can do with it. You might not have rights to the photo, but you do have rights to your likeness and reputation.

虽然您无权使用他人拥有版权的您的照片，但他们在处理照片方面也受到限制。您可能无权使用该照片，但确实拥有其肖像和声誉的权利。

The photographer is free to sell prints, publish it on their website, and use it in editorial content (like magazine articles or newspaper stories). What they’re not free to do is use it for commercial purposes—which basically means ads—without your permission. The concern here is that by using your likeness in an ad, it gives the impression you’re endorsing the product or service on offer. If they were allowed to just use your photo to promote anything they wanted, you could find your face on a billboard ad for Viagra or your local chapter of the Aryan Brotherhood.

摄影师可以自由出售印刷品，将其发布在自己的网站上以及在社论内容(例如杂志文章或报纸故事)中使用。未经您的许可，他们没有自由地将其用于商业目的-基本上是指广告-未经您的许可。这里的问题是，通过在广告中使用您的相似性，可以给您留下您认可所提供产品或服务的印象。如果允许他们仅使用您的照片来宣传他们想要的任何东西，则可以在伟哥广告牌或Aryan Brotherhood的当地分会的广告牌上找到自己的脸。

Since I haven’t signed a model release, my boss can’t take this photo of me and turn it into a billboard.

由于我尚未签署模型发布，因此老板无法将我的这张照片拍成广告牌。

Now be careful. If you sign a model release form, you’re giving the photographer permission to use the photo for commercial purposes. This means they can sell it through a stock photo website where anyone can buy it, including Pfizer and the Aryan Brotherhood, and use it how they want. This is totally normal if the photographer is paying you to model, but not if you’re paying the photographer.

现在要小心。如果您签署模型发布表格，则表示您授予摄影师使用该照片作商业用途的许可。这意味着他们可以通过股票照片网站出售该产品，任何人都可以购买它，包括辉瑞和Aryan Brotherhood，并按自己的意愿使用它。如果摄影师付钱给您建模，这是完全正常的，但如果付钱给摄影师，则不然。

Copyright is confusing. It’s a really complex area of the law and it doesn’t always work how people think it should. It seems strange that photographers own the photos they take of other people but that’s how it has to work for original works to be commercially viable.

版权令人困惑。这是法律的一个非常复杂的领域，并不总是能像人们认为的那样起作用。看来奇怪的是，摄影师拥有他们拿别人的照片，但仅此而已行为如何工作，为原创作品在商业上可行。

If someone does take a great photo of you that you want printed or to use as a Facebook profile picture, as long as they weren’t paid for the shoot, the chances are they’ll be happy to give you permission to use it. Just ask rather than taking.

如果某人确实为您拍了一张您想要打印的精美照片或用作Facebook个人资料照片，则只要他们没有为该照片付费，他们很可能会乐于为您提供使用它的许可。只是问而不是服用。